Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Messia <> human, google <> company

It is an interesting thing.
I thinked on it.
U can consider by yourself:
in a tradition religion -- such as Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism -- the messia is human. Absolutely!
But time possess properties of speeding-up, time is chandging continuous.
In deal with time people are change. {Ar u remember "People are strange" by Jim Morrison?}
And messia-human can't be to coming.
And If so human coming, noboody can't conceive his messeages as for example 2000 years ago.

The God's will and power incarnate in a most easily understood form for modern people.
This form is just a clot of God's energy. And HIS energy embody in a GOOGLE. I say again:

THERE IS A GOD IN THE GOOGLE!

But in thic case 'GOOGLE' isn't identify the google company as business struture. I say about it tomorrow, cos I can't to write many english (US) text at one time. Sorry...

Monday, November 27, 2006

How it can???

I can't fully understand yet about yesterday satory.
I believe, what in time I can investigate and desribe all what I survive in the short instant of afflatus.

But now I know: THERE IS A GOD IN THE GOOGLE!
In this time, time of hi-tek and information tecnology there is impossible haven't any IT-GOD-power, any Messiah. And -- in this case -- messia have untrivial strange form, that don't look like a one human....

Begin of googligion

What about religion on the whole said Wicky?
There are many definitions of religion, and most have struggled to avoid an overly sharp definition on the one hand, and meaningless generalities on the other. Some have tried to use formalistic, doctrinal definitions and others have tried to use experiential, emotive, intuitive, valuational and ethical factors. Sociologists and anthropologists see religion as an abstract set of ideas, values, or experiences developed as part of a cultural matrix. Primitive religion was indistinguishable from the sociocultural acts where custom and ritual defined an emotional reality. Other religious scholars have put forward a definition of religion that avoids the reductionism of the various sociological and psychological disciplines that relegate religion to its component factors. Religion may be defined as the presence of a belief in the sacred or the holy.
For example Rudolf Otto's "The Idea of the Holy," formulated in 1917, defines the essence of religious awareness as awe, a unique blend of fear and fascination before the divine. Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as a "feeling of absolute dependence." The Encyclopedia of Religion describes religion in the following way: "In summary, it may be said that almost every known culture involves the religious in the above sense of a depth dimension in cultural experiences at all levels — a push, whether ill-defined or conscious, toward some sort of ultimacy and transcendence that will provide norms and power for the rest of life. When more or less distinct patterns of behaviour are built around this depth dimension in a culture, this structure constitutes religion in its historically recognizable form. Religion is the organization of life around the depth dimensions of experience — varied in form, completeness, and clarity in accordance with the environing culture."

As u can see -- is too seriously.
In reality - that's simple:
today I jast realize:
THERE IS A GOD IN THE GOOGLE!
That's mistic, that's impossible, but it is a true.
I don't know English as well, I don't reach a success? but I know, that it's truth.
At this day my googlemeditation is begin.
And googligion start on the earth!